Healthcare companies require provider credentialing, compliance, and workforce logistics to manage their operations. To effectively do this, they depend on credentialing systems like Symplr.
Symplr has long been a go-to solution for many organizations, offering a suite of tools tailored to these needs. However, as the industry evolves, so do the requirements of healthcare providers, leading many to seek alternatives that offer advanced features, better user experiences, and more responsive support.
If you’re evaluating Symplr but want to see how it stacks up against other credentialing and compliance solutions, this guide gives you the essentials:
An overview of Symplr and where it fits
Buyer scenarios where you may need an alternative
Five leading competitors with unique advantages
Expanded comparison table and evaluation checklist
Let’s get right in.
How we evaluated Symplr alternatives (2025 buyer criteria)
To keep this comparison fair and 2025-ready, each vendor was evaluated against the same set of criteria that healthcare operations leaders consistently prioritize:
Automation depth: Coverage of credentialing workflows, PSV, roster reconciliation, renewables, and alerts
Integrations: APIs, webhooks, and support for CAQH, PECOS, NPPES, SSO/SCIM, EHR/RCM systems
Symplr is a cloud-based healthcare governance, risk management, and compliance (GRC) software platform designed to streamline various administrative processes within healthcare organizations.
Below is a brief overview of Symplr:
Focus: Governance, risk management, compliance, and provider credentialing
Where it fits: Hospitals and large health systems needing workforce logistics plus compliance
Standout: Broad suite of compliance and vendor management tools
Compliance Tracking: HIPAA, OSHA, and policy management
Vendor & Contract Management: Ensures third-party compliance and centralizes agreements
Pros of using Symplr
The platform simplifies attendance tracking, payroll processes, and credentialing workflows, saving time for HR teams and administrators
It can store all provider data in one secure location, with features like multi-factor authentication enhancing security
User-friendly interface with intuitive navigation
Regular updates incorporating user feedback
Cons of using Symplr
Some users report slow performance during peak hours.
Feedback from G2 ratings indicates inconsistent customer service, with some users experiencing rude interactions or slow resolutions to support requests
Several reviewers feel the interface could use a refresh to make navigation more intuitive and visually appealing
While Symplr offers robust reporting capabilities, creating custom reports can be lengthy and complicated for users unfamiliar with the system
The appearance of unused features in certain modules creates unnecessary confusion for users who haven't purchased the full package
Pricing
Symplr offers customized pricing based on the specific solutions and scale required by an organization. Only available upon request.
Why look for Symplr alternatives?
While Symplr provides a robust set of tools for healthcare administration, organizations may seek alternatives due to:
Performance Issues: Reports of slow system response times
Customer Support: Inconsistent experiences with support services
Complexity: Some features may have a steep learning curve
Cost Considerations: Budget constraints prompting the search for more cost-effective solutions
MD-Staff, developed by Applied Statistics & Management, Inc., is a comprehensive, cloud-based credentialing and provider information management platform designed to streamline healthcare operations.
Its features include automated workflows, real-time tracking, and robust reporting capabilities.
Unique angle: Built for credentialing depth and reporting, with a modular design for customization
Best for: Organizations prioritizing detailed provider credentialing and privileging
The platform has an intuitive and user-friendly interface, allowing staff to navigate and utilize the software with minimal training
It supports seamless integration with other systems such as electronic health records (EHRs), human resources (HR) software, and payroll tools
Users can access MD-Staff features and information from mobile devices, allowing for on-the-go access to critical data and functionalities
They provide exceptional customer support to assist users with any technical issues or questions they may have
Cons of using MD-Staff::
Some users find the software’s customization options limited, potentially not catering to highly specific or unique workflows without further development
Despite its user-friendly design, there is a slight learning curve for new users unfamiliar with similar software solutions
MD-Staff’s pricing may be a significant consideration for smaller healthcare organizations with limited budgets
Verisys offers comprehensive credentialing and provider data management solutions. Its platform ensures compliance and reduces risk by providing verified data and continuous monitoring of healthcare providers.
Unique angle: A compliance monitoring specialist platform with one of the most comprehensive exclusion and sanctions databases
Best for: Organizations prioritizing continuous monitoring and risk mitigation
MedTrainer offers a combination of credentialing tools and compliance training. It’s especially useful for healthcare organizations that want a centralized system to manage provider credentials and keep up with training requirements.
By automating credentialing tasks and integrating a built-in learning management system (LMS), MedTrainer helps teams stay on top of regulatory updates without juggling multiple platforms.
Unique angle: The only platform that combines credentialing with a built-in LMS for compliance training
Best for: Teams that want credentialing + training in one system
All-in-one platform for credentialing and compliance training
Simplifies regulatory tracking and audit prep
Integrates well with most existing systems
Cons of Medallion:
It can be time-consuming to set up for large organizations
Reporting tools may feel limited for advanced needs
Comparison table
Platform Comparison
Platform
Unique Angle
Automation Depth
Integrations
Compliance
Best Fit
Limits
Assured
Full-stack lifecycle platform
Strong
APIs, CAQH, PECOS, NPPES, EHR
NCQA, SOC 2, HITRUST
All organization sizes, scaling teams
Workflow setup; learning curve
QGenda
Scheduling + credentialing
Moderate
HRIS, EHR, comms
Credentialing in the scheduling context
Hospitals, health systems
Overwhelming for new users
MD-Staff
Credentialing + reporting
Strong
EHR, HR, payroll
CVO services
Credentialing-heavy organizations
Pricing; limited customization
Verisys
Compliance monitoring
Strong
Limited
FACIS®, exclusions monitoring
Risk-focused organizations
Limited UI/customization
MedTrainer
Credentialing + LMS
Moderate
Policy, docs
LMS compliance courses
Teams needing training + credentialing
Set up; reporting limits
Decision guide + scorecard
There isn’t a single “best” alternative; it all depends on your workflow, budget, and what’s slowing you down right now.
So, before choosing a Symplr alternative, ask:
Do you need scheduling efficiency, credentialing depth, or a full-stack solution?
Must the platform handle 50-state licensing, DEA/CSR?
What systems must it integrate with (EHR, HRIS, billing)?
Do you prioritize compliance monitoring or training?
What SLA (Service Level Agreement) and support levels do you require?
Scorecard
Platform Comparison
Criterion
Weight
Assured
QGenda
MD-Staff
Verisys
MedTrainer
Automation depth
20%
Strong
Moderate
Strong
Strong
Moderate
Integrations
20%
Strong
Strong
Moderate
Limited
Moderate
Compliance
15%
Strong
Moderate
Strong
Strong
Moderate
Licensing support
15%
Strong
Limited
Moderate
Limited
Limited
Speed/accuracy
15%
Strong
Moderate
Moderate
Strong
Moderate
Price/fit
15%
Flexible
Enterprise
Mid-range
Enterprise
Mid-range
Why Switch to Assured
Unlike Symplr, which leans heavily on workforce and compliance modules, Assured integrates all aspects of provider management into one system, including licensing, credentialing, payer enrollment, and ongoing network monitoring.
Automation-First Approach: Assured reduces manual work through automated PSV, CAQH/PECOS sync, license renewals, and real-time roster reconciliation. This automation translates directly into faster credentialing times and reduced administrative overhead
Compliance You Can Trust: As an NCQA-certified CVO and SOC 2/HITRUST-compliant platform, Assured ensures credentialing and enrollment processes meet the highest standards while keeping sensitive provider data secure
Scalable Across Organizations: From small practices scaling to 50 providers to large health systems managing thousands, Assured adapts to growth with multi-state licensing, DEA/CSR support, and IMLC compact licensing
Transparency and Speed: Where Symplr users often complain about performance issues and complex navigation, Assured prioritizes ease of adoption and real-time visibility, with most organizations seeing reductions in credentialing time by over 50%
Switching to Assured means moving from fragmented, compliance-heavy workflows to a streamlined, automation-driven platform built for modern healthcare operations.
Conclusion
Symplr is a solid option, but it’s not the only one. In 2025, platforms like MedTrainer, MD-Staff, Verisys, QGenda, and Assured are offering healthcare teams flexible, focused alternatives that can simplify operations without overcomplicating your tech stack.
If you're looking for a platform that’s streamlined, easy to adopt, and built specifically for modern credentialing workflows, Assured is at the top of the list. It’s especially great for teams that are tired of clunky systems and want to get things done faster.
See why more healthcare teams are switching to Assured: withassured.com
Sometimes, the simplest choice is also the smartest.