Top 6 Verifiable Alternatives You Must Consider in 2025 [Ranked]

Credentialing, licensing, and enrollment have always been a major part of provider operations. However, over the past few years, health systems, telehealth companies, and payers have been pushed to deliver care faster, onboard new clinicians quickly, and reduce the delays that slow revenue. 

Because these workflows have become more complicated, many organizations have turned to modern platforms like Verifiable to automate parts of the process.

Verifiable entered the market as a fresh alternative to spreadsheets, outdated credentialing software, and manual PSV work. It promised speed, automation, and strong data connectivity, and for many teams, especially early-stage digital health groups, it delivered exactly that. The platform grew fast by positioning itself as an “API-first” credentialing engine with modern integrations, a polished interface, and a mission to reduce paperwork.

But as organizations scaled into larger provider networks, multi-state licensing, and delegated credentialing programs, many discovered limitations in complex operations. 

As you read, you’ll learn:

• An overview of Verifiable and where it fits
• Why you may need an alternative
• Six leading competitors with unique advantages
• Expanded comparison table and evaluation checklist

Let’s get right in.

How we evaluated (2025 Buyer Criteria)

We scored each platform against eight criteria. You can use these to align priorities with your organization’s needs.

‍

Scoring note: We use Strong / Moderate / Limited for each vendor.

What is Verifiable?

Verifiable is a modern credentialing and provider network management platform built for speed, automation, and compliance. It’s designed to help healthcare organizations reduce manual work, onboard providers faster, and maintain complete visibility across licensing, enrollment, and monitoring.

Below is a brief overview of Verifiable:

Best for: Organizations such as digital health startups, telehealth companies, payers, and health systems (especially those seeking to modernize their operations and move away from spreadsheets or legacy tools).

Standout automations

• Primary Source Verification (PSV) across licensure and education
• Automated document collection and credential expiry tracking
• Provider profile updates through API syncs

Integrations

• Direct connectivity with CAQH, NPPES, and state licensing boards
• EHR and RCM data sync via REST APIs

Compliance & trust

• SOC 2 Type II certified
• NCQA CVO certified

Pricing

Custom pricing based on organizational needs and scale. Only available upon request. 

Why look for a Verifiable alternative?

Verifiable has become a popular choice for organizations that want to modernize their credentialing and verification processes. Many teams love that it replaces spreadsheets, automates license checks, and connects to data sources such as CAQH and NPPES. For smaller groups or fast-moving digital health startups, this feels like a major upgrade.

But once organizations begin to scale, adding more providers, more states, more payers, and more compliance responsibilities, the cracks start to show. These cracks stem from structural limitations in the platform’s design, its reliance on Salesforce, its dependence on manual labor behind the scenes, and the operational risks that arise as volumes grow.

1. Salesforce limits 

Most customers don’t realize that Verifiable is built as a Salesforce-managed package. This means everything, every PSV record, every audit log, every provider file, every document, goes into Salesforce. And while Salesforce is a great CRM, it was not built to handle the data volume required for modern credentialing.

As provider volume grows, Verifiable customers start running into:

• Slow verification cycles
• “Governor limit” throttling
• Failed batch jobs
• Missing metadata sync errors
• Records that don’t save because validation rules have changed
• Storage costs that grow out of control

These problems don’t happen because users did something wrong. They happen because Salesforce wasn’t designed for the heavy, continuous workload of PSV, enrollment data, expiration tracking, and large document storage.

And when Salesforce slows down, Verifiable slows down, because the entire platform sits on top of it.

Large organizations quickly discover that they are paying for two systems:

• Verifiable
• Salesforce licenses + storage overages

This is a major reason teams explore alternatives.

2. Automation breakdowns

Verifiable positions itself as “automated,” but deeper analysis shows that much of its automation relies on:

• RPA (Robotic Process Automation) scripts
• Scraping tools
• Website interactions
• Manual fallback teams (“Verification Specialists”) fixing what breaks

This means automation is not stable, it is conditional. When a state medical board updates its web layout, the script fails. When a data source requires MFA (Multi-Factor Authentication) or changes its API, the job fails. 

3. Storage costs 

On Salesforce, every file counts toward storage, and Salesforce storage is famously expensive.

Once organizations hit the 10 GB cap, they start getting charged per GB, and the cost increases.

For cost-conscious organizations, this is one of the biggest reasons to consider alternatives.

4. Enrollment capabilities 

Verifiable does license checks and PSV well. But many organizations have discovered that payer enrollment automation is limited.

Teams still must:

• Update CAQH manually
• Handle Medicaid and PECOS workflows themselves
• Track payer steps in spreadsheets
• Follow up on portal requests
• Manage re-attestations separately

This is where the platform’s API-first branding feels incomplete, because enrollment is not just data verification; it’s a revenue workflow.

For organizations growing across multiple states, with many payers, many provider types, and delegated programs, missing enrollment automation quickly leads to lost revenue.

With more organizations recognizing the limitations of Verifiable’s Salesforce-based architecture, many teams are exploring tools that can handle large provider networks, high-volume enrollment, and day-to-day compliance without the hidden costs or automation breaks. 

The 5 best Verifiable alternatives for credentialing in 2025

1. Assured (the best alternative for Verifiable)

If you’re looking for a platform that combines AI automation with real human support, Assured is the platform you're looking for. 

Designed by credentialing and licensing experts, it’s built to reduce delays and administrative problems, especially as your organization scales across providers, payers, and states. 

The platform simplifies and automates licensing, credentialing, payor enrollment, and network management.

Assured is best for

Healthcare organizations are seeking a unified platform that combines AI automation with human oversight to cut credentialing turnaround times and reduce manual errors.

Assured's standout automations

• AI-powered Pre-Submission Validation (checks 2,000+ sources before sending applications)
• Continuous 24/7 monitoring of licenses, DEA, board certifications, and exclusion lists
• Parallel payer enrollment (submit to all payers simultaneously)
• Automated CAQH attestation and PECOS integration
• Real-time visibility with a step-by-step dashboard

Integrations

• CAQH ProView, PECOS, NPPES, Medicare/Medicaid, and major payer portals
• REST and GraphQL APIs for EHR, RCM, and identity management (SSO/SCIM)

Compliance & Trust

• NCQA-certified CVO | SOC 2 Type II | HITRUST alignment
• Automated audit trails and full activity logging for delegated credentialing.

Pricing

Custom pricing based on organizational needs and scale. Only available upon request. However, you can book a free demo here.

Why Assured: Feature comparison

Below is a summary of how Assured addresses common industry shortcomings observed in Verifiable and other vendors.

Feature Gap #1 – Pre-submission error detection

Verifiable relies partly on scraping and RPA, which break when websites change. Assured uses real predictive + semantic AI to check every field against over 2,000 sources before anything is submitted.

This prevents “blind submissions” that account for 40–60% of industry rejections.

Impact:

• 95% first-pass success
• Credentialing cut to 48 hours
• No silent failures caused by website/portal changes

Feature Gap #2 – Automated payer enrollment management

Verifiable focuses mostly on PSV (Primary Source Verification) and license checks. Enrollment remains highly manual and must be tracked in spreadsheets.

Assured automates everything: parallel submissions, CAQH updates, PECOS tasks, Medicaid variations, roster automation, and revenue forecasting.

Impact:

• 30% faster in-network activation
• 20–40 billing days recovered per provider (subject to payer)

Feature Gap #3 – Dedicated human specialist

Verifiable uses ticketing queues and human “verification specialists” to fix automation failures. Assured assigns a named specialist to every customer, who meets weekly with your team, monitors your pipeline, and resolves issues proactively.

Impact:

• Issues resolved 3× faster
• Smoother onboarding
• Zero “chasing” for updates

Feature Gap #4 – Real-time visibility

Salesforce-based tools like Verifiable hide many issues behind sync logs, metadata errors, and validation failures.

Assured displays every step, every verification, and every delay in one simple timeline.

Impact:

• Predictable onboarding
• Instant root-cause visibility
• No spreadsheets needed

Feature Gap #5 – 24/7 Monitoring across 2,000+ sources

Unlike Verifiable, which suffers from RPA breaking when board sites change, Assured continuously monitors compliance sources using real AI.

Impact:

• No missed expirable dates
• No risk of lapsed licenses
• Full delegated audit protection

Assured is ideal for teams looking to replace Verifiable’s Salesforce architecture, eliminate RPA fragility, reduce manual work, and automate end-to-end credentialing and enrollment.

Summary: Assured vs. Verifiable

‍

2. Andros

Andros is a complete Network Lifecycle Platform powered by Andros Arc™. It is designed for health plans, telehealth platforms, and digital-first provider networks. 

It streamlines credentialing, network design, payer enrollment, and regulatory compliance workflows. Accredited as an NCQA-certified CVO, Andros enables organizations to quickly and precisely build and maintain provider networks.

Best for

Health plans and MSOs focused on provider network development and analytics.

Standout Automations

• Network adequacy analytics and geospatial mapping
• Credentialing and contracting within a single portal

Integrations

• Custom API for EHR and data warehouses
• Limited CAQH direct sync (verify in demo)

Compliance & Trust

• SOC 2 Type II certified
• NCQA certified

Considerations

• Automation depth varies by module; some manual data cleanup is still required

Pros

• Users compliment the platform’s fast NCQA-certified credentialing, which is up to 10x quicker than legacy processes
• Users report seamless integration of credentialing with network strategy, contracting, and monitoring
• The platform has a centralized system with strong data intelligence and API availability
• Users report high compliance accuracy and reduced audit risk through professional oversight and automated alerts

Cons

• Smaller teams may find onboarding complex and may require more training to use all features
• Organizations with highly customized workflows have reported feeling constrained by standard processes

Pricing

Custom pricing based on organizational needs and scale. Only available upon request.

3. MD-Staff

Built by Applied Statistics & Management (ASM), MD‑Staff is created to help growing organizations that need robust automation, flexible workflows, and expert support. 

The platform leverages AI-powered automation, deep integrations, and modular features to support every stage of provider lifecycle management.

Best for

Hospitals and health systems needing deep MSO credentialing tools with committee review workflows.

Standout Automations

• PSV automation for licenses and certifications
• Integration with hospital bylaws and FPPE/OPPE modules

Integrations

• HL7 and EHR integrations (Epic, Cerner)
• Limited CAQH/PECOS connectivity

Compliance & Trust

• NCQA CVO-certified
• SOC 2 Type II verified

Considerations

• On-prem version lacks scalability compared to cloud alternatives
• Setup can take 8–12 weeks

Pros

• Users commend the platform’s intelligent automation (via Aiva), which can significantly reduce manual work and speed up reappointments, follow-ups, and data notifications
• Users report that the platform has a scalable, modular architecture that accommodates both small and large organizations
• Users compliment that the platform’s extensive reporting, analytics, and real-time tracking improve oversight and compliance readiness
• Users say they receive comprehensive onboarding, training, and ongoing support via the MD‑Staff Academy and tenured support team 

Cons

• Some organizations report a learning curve during implementation, especially for teams new to automated workflows
• Some users report deep customization for highly complex or unique workflows, which may require additional configuration or vendor support

Pricing

Custom pricing based on organizational needs and scale. Only available upon request.

4. CertifyOS

CertifyOS (often referred to simply as Certify) is a platform that adopts an API-first, progress-driven approach to credentialing, licensing, enrollment, and network monitoring. 

By integrating directly with hundreds of primary data sources, CertifyOS delivers real-time verification, significantly reducing credentialing times while ensuring accuracy and compliance. 

Best for

Digital health companies and TPAs requiring API-driven credentialing and enrollment.

Standout Automations

• End-to-end credentialing API
• Background check and PSV automation

Integrations

• CAQH and NPPES data sync
• REST API available for custom applications

Compliance & Trust

• SOC 2 Type II certified
• Delegated credentialing support

Considerations

• Limited payer enrollment automation (credentialing only)

Pros

• Users report a modern, intuitive user interface with fast onboarding
• Users report rapid credentialing turnarounds, often within minutes
• A unified platform for credentialing, licensing, enrollment, and monitoring
• User reports strong automation that reduces manual work across workflows
• From user reviews, the platform is NCQA-certified and continuously compliant at every stage

Cons

• Human support can be limited; some users report delays in urgent issue resolution
• Advanced reporting may require additional setup or export steps
• Some workflows, such as multi-committee privileging, may require back-end support

Pricing: 

Custom pricing based on organizational needs and scale. Only available upon request.

5. ClinicMind

ClinicMind is a cloud-based practice management and EHR platform. Initially launched to address billing challenges, it has since evolved into a comprehensive platform designed for multi-specialty practices, including mental health, chiropractic, and behavioral health clinics. 

ClinicMind integrates clinical documentation, billing, credentialing, and patient engagement into a single system. 

Best for

Small-to-mid-size medical groups needing EHR and credentialing integration.

Standout Automations

• Credentialing linked to practice management and billing
• Provider document reminders within EHR dashboard

Integrations

• Built-in EHR and billing modules
• Limited external API connectivity

Compliance & Trust

• HIPAA compliant; SOC 2 Type I reviewed

Considerations

• Better suited for single specialty clinics

Pros

• Combines EHR, billing, credentialing, RCM, and patient engagement in one system, simplifying workflows and reducing tool fragmentation
• Users report that ClinicMind EHR 2.0 introduces a slick, user-friendly interface built on provider feedback, reducing training time and improving navigation
• Practices often report significant increases in collections and reductions in denials thanks to integrated billing automation and analytics dashboards
• Users report that capabilities like PatientHub for engagement, built-in credentialing workflows, and practice analytics help clinics grow efficiently

Cons

• Some users report that the platform’s breadth can feel overwhelming, particularly during the onboarding phase, requiring training 
• Many users say that tailoring documentation templates or workflows (especially in FlexNote) requires additional setup time or professional services.
• While ClinicMind includes credentialing functionality, it may lack advanced, audit-driven PSV or multi-state enrollment automation found in dedicated credentialing platforms.
• They are not NCQA certified. 

Pricing

Custom pricing based on organizational needs and scale. Only available upon request.

6. QGenda

QGenda is a cloud-based workforce management platform that unifies scheduling, credentialing, time tracking, and analytics in a single hub. 

With over 4,500 healthcare organizations, including hospitals and academic centers, QGenda helps accelerate provider onboarding, reduce credentialing time, and ensure providers are scheduled only after they are fully credentialed. 

Best for

Enterprise-level organizations prioritizing provider scheduling alongside credentialing.

Standout Automations

• Centralized provider data hub
• Automated license tracking and alerts

Integrations

• Broad EHR connections and SSO support
• Limited payer portal automations

Compliance & Trust

• SOC 2 Type II | HITRUST certified

Considerations

• Credentialing is part of a larger suite; may feel heavy for smaller teams.
• Custom automation features require enterprise licenses

Pros

• Customers report credentialing time reduced from 90 to 30 days, or half as long, due to workflow automation
• Combines scheduling and credentialing, when a provider isn’t credentialed, they are automatically prevented from being scheduled
• Users report that the platform syncs with scheduling systems, CAQH, payroll, HRIS, and provider databases
• Providers and staff can manage schedules and credentials via a mobile app without desktop access

Cons

• The platform can feel overwhelming at first, especially for smaller teams; training and configuration may take time
• Some users report inflexible scheduling or credentialing workflows that aren’t easily tailored
• Although 24/7 support is offered, some organizations report slow response times or inconsistent access to dedicated consultants
• The software is not directly “NCQA certified,” even though it helps clients maintain compliance with NCQA standards.

Pricing

Custom pricing based on organizational needs and scale. Only available upon request. 

Decision guide + Scorecard

‍

Choosing the right Verifiable alternative

Choosing the right alternative is about finding a solution that fits your workflow, your team, and your long-term goals, without compromising on speed, accuracy, or compliance.

When comparing alternatives, here are a few things to keep in mind:

• Automation Depth: How much manual work does the platform eliminate? Look for other options that reduce credentialing and enrollment timelines, not just track them
• Visibility & Control: Can your team easily track application statuses, licensing timelines, and enrollment progress? A great alternative should make this data accessible in real-time 
• Scalability: If you’re credentialing 100 providers or 10,000, the platform should grow with you. That includes support for multi-state licensing, payer enrollments, and complex provider hierarchies
• Hands-On Support: Don’t overlook onboarding and customer service. A responsive, knowledgeable support team can make all the difference when you're managing a high-stakes, high-volume workflow
• Pricing & ROI: The best platform should help you save, not just in dollars, but in time, staffing resources, and revenue lost to credentialing delays or enrollment gaps

The right Verifiable alternative is the one that simplifies complexity, accelerates your operations, and gives your team room to focus on what matters most: delivering care and scaling your network confidently.

The Assured advantage: ROI comparison

If speed, scalability, and real-time monitoring are at the top of your list, Assured provides a clear operational advantage. Here’s how:

‍

The platform doesn’t just help you move faster; it enables you to save big on resources while improving provider satisfaction and compliance.

Wrapping up: Take the next step with Assured

When provider operations slow down, everything else does too, revenue, patient access, and your ability to grow. That’s why choosing the right credentialing and enrollment partner needs to be done strategically.

Assured is a true partner in simplifying the most complex parts of your provider lifecycle (credentialing, licensing, payer enrollment, and ongoing monitoring), all with the speed and transparency today’s healthcare demands.

If you're looking to reduce delays, cut operational costs, and finally get ahead of compliance issues, Assured is the upgrade your team has been waiting for.

Book a demo and see how Assured can transform your credentialing from a challenge into a competitive edge.